data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85c28/85c28ddf00ea3233d82295694829be0a7992005c" alt="Cover of The Federalist Papers"
The Federalist Papers
by Alexander Hamilton
"The Federalist Papers," authored by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, presents a compelling argument for the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, emphasizing the necessity of a strong federal government to maintain order and protect liberty. Central themes include the dangers of tyranny that arise from concentrating power in a single entity, whether through heredity or election, and the fine balance required to prevent government overreach while ensuring its effectiveness. The authors contend that a government must be able to manage the governed while simultaneously restraining itself, as human nature is inherently flawed. The tension between liberty and security is explored, illustrating how in times of external threat, even the most ardent supporters of freedom may sacrifice liberties for safety. The essays argue for a system of checks and balances, asserting that a vigorous government is essential for the protection of freedoms, with history demonstrating that demagogues often exploit popular sentiments to undermine liberty. Moreover, the authors reflect on the importance of informed citizenry and the dangers of factionalism, likening liberty to air for fire,essential yet potentially destructive. Ultimately, "The Federalist Papers" serves as a foundational text advocating for a government that balances authority with accountability, aiming for the common good while recognizing the complexities of human nature and governance.
30 popular highlights from this book
Key Insights & Memorable Quotes
Below are the most popular and impactful highlights and quotes from The Federalist Papers:
The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, selfappointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.
Safety from external danger is the most powerful director of national conduct. Even the ardent love of liberty will, after a time, give way to its dictates. The violent destruction of life and property incident to war, the continual effort and alarm attendant on a state of continual danger, will compel nations the most attached to liberty to resort for repose and security to institutions which have a tendency to destroy their civil and political rights. To be more safe, they at length become willing to run the risk of being less free.
It has been frequently remarked, that it seems to have been reserved to the people of this country to decide, by their conduct and example, the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not, of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend, for their political constitutions, on accident and force.
On the other hand, it will be equally forgotten that the vigor of government is essential to the security of liberty; that, in the contemplation of a sound and well-informed judgment, their interest can never be separated; and that a dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people than under the forbidden appearance of zeal for the firmness and efficiency of government. History will teach us that the former has been found a much more certain road to the introduction of despotism than the latter, and that of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying an obsequious court to the people; commencing demagogues, and ending tyrants.
The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed.
You must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place, oblige it to control itself.
A powerful, victorious ally is yet another name for master.
When occasions present themselves in which the interests of the people are at variance with their inclinations, it is the duty of the persons whom they have appointed to be the guardians of those interests to withstand the temporary delusion in order to give them time and opportunity for more cool and sedate reflection. Instances might be cited in which a conduct of this kind has saved the people from very fatal consequences of their own mistakes, and has procured lasting monuments of their gratitude to the men who had courage and magnanimity enough to serve them at the peril of their displeasure.
For in politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. Heresies in either can rarely be cured by persecution.
It will be of little avail to the people, that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood;
It may be a reflection on human nature, that such devices should be necessary to control the abuses of government. But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.
Vigor of government is essential to the security of liberty.
The operations of the federal government will be most extensive and important in times of war and danger; those of the State governments, in times of peace and security.
If men were angels, no government would be necessary.
Distrust naturally creates distrust, and by nothing is good will and kind conduct more speedily changed.
Liberty is to faction what air is to fire...
Had every Athenian citizen been a Socrates, every Athenian assembly would still have been a mob.
A good Government implies two things: first, fidelity to the object of Government, which is the happiness of the People; secondly, a knowledge of the means by which that object can be best attained.
Divide et impera must be the motto of every nation that either hates or fears us.
If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.
If the federal government should overpass the just bounds of its authority and make a tyrannical use of its powers, the people, whose creature it is, must appeal to the standard they have formed, and take such measures to redress the injury done to the Constitution as the exigency may suggest and prudence justify.
To all general purposes we have uniformly been one people each individual citizen everywhere enjoying the same national rights, privileges, and protection.
Among the many objects to which a wise and free people find it necessary to direct their attention, that of providing for their safety seems to be the first.
Experience is the oracle of truth; and where its responses are unequivocal, they ought to be conclusive and sacred.
If we are to be one Nation in any respect, it clearly ought to be in respect to other Nations.
To judge from the conduct of the opposite parties, we shall be led to conclude that they will mutually hope to evince the justness of their opinions, and to increase the number of their converts by the loudness of their declamations and the bitterness of their invectives. An enlightened zeal for the energy and efficiency of government will be stigmatized as the offspring of a temper fond of despotic power and hostile to the principles of liberty. An over-scrupulous jealousy of danger to the rights of the people, which is more commonly the fault of the head than of the heart, will be represented as mere pretense and artifice, the stale bait for popularity at the expense of the public good.
Every man the least conversant in Roman story, knows how often that republic was obliged to take refuge in the absolute power of a single man, under the formidable title of Dictator, as well against the intrigues of ambitious individuals who aspired to the tyranny, and the seditions of whole classes of the community whose conduct threatened the existence of all government, as against the invasions of external enemies who menaced the conquest and destruction of Rome.
And a further reason for caution, in this respect, might be drawn from the reflection that we are not always sure that those who advocate the truth are influenced by purer principles than their antagonists. Ambition, avarice, personal animosity, party opposition, and many other motives not more laudable than these, are apt to operate as well upon those who support as those who oppose the right side of a question. Were there not even these inducements to moderation, nothing could be more ill-judged than that intolerant spirit which has, at all times, characterized political parties. For in politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. Heresies in either can rarely be cured by persecution.
Have we not already seen enough of the fallacy and extravagance of those idle theories which have amused us with promises of an exemption from the imperfections, weaknesses and evils incident to society in every shape?
Of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics the greatest number have begun their career, by paying an obsequious court to the people; commencing Demagogues, and ending Tyrants.